Support phones:
homeReloadContact Us
Home About Us Our Guarantees Beware Our Prices Discounts Order Now Blog FAQ Testimonials Sample essays Contact Us
main menu
About Us
Our Guarantees
How it works
Our Prices
Order Now
Testimonials (1034)
Sample essays
Contact Us
you save
Type of assignment:
Writer level:
Cost per page:
Total without discount:
sample essays
Analytical Essays
Application Essays
Architecture Essays
Argument Essays
Argumentative Essays
Art Essays
Business Essays
Case Studies Essays
Communication and Media Essays
Comparison Essays
Computer Technologies Essays
Controversial Essays
Critical Essays
Definition Essays
Economics Essays
Education Essays
Geography Essays
History Essays
Justice Essays
Law Essays
Life Essays
Literature Essays
Marketing Essays
Medicine Essays
Nursing Essays
Personal Essays
Philosophy Essays
Political science Essays
Politics Essays
Psychology Essays
Religion Essays
Sociology Essays
Technology Essays
Term Papers Essays
World Literature Essays

← Rosenberg TrialQuasi Contract →
Live Chat

Custom Student Fundamental Rights essay paper sample

Buy custom Student Fundamental Rights essay paper cheap

The fourth amendment to the United States constitution is part of the bill of rights that does not allow unreasonable searches and seizures by the government agents. A court order i.e. warrant must be presented by these agents in order to do a reasonable search or seizure. It is the individual’s right that no executive or Legislative branches that can make unreasonable search reasonable, or a reasonable search unreasonable (Amsterdam 349). A person who feels that his or her fourth amendment right has been violated by an unreasonable search or seizure should file a civil suit and seek a court order because of such unlawful acts by the government agents. Such violations of civil rights are punishable by federal law or state (Lasson, 30).

Savanna Redding was thirteen years old in the year 2003 when educators in the rural eastern Arizona did a search. They were actually searching for pills because they had been banned in the district together with the drugs that were sold over the counter without advance permission. They searched Redding’s backpack and her outer clothes but to make it worse they went ahead to search her underwear. A supreme court in 1985 warned against a search that was “extremely intrusive”. According to the court it was very illegal and Redding was pleased with the court’s decision (Ducat and Harold 798). She was happy to say that “I’m pretty excited about it, because that’s what I wanted. I wanted to keep it from happening to anybody else”.  Redding’s lawyer, Adam Wolf, said that “the court’s decision sends a clear signal to school officials that they can strip search students only in the most extra ordinary situations”.

Justice Thomas said that the search was legal because the court had already given school officials freedom under the fourth amendment in the school settings. He said that “it was eminently reasonable to conclude the backpack was empty because Redding was hiding the pills in a place she thought no one would look”. In fact this would be true because most of the schools do not tolerate drugs and students can go ahead to hide them in their under wears. The students are not likely to hide drugs in their back pack because they can easily be found but would rather put them in their inner clothes. Thomas continues to argue that “Redding would not have been the first person to conceal pills in her under garments, nor will she be the last after today’s decision, which announces the safest place to secrete contraband in school”.  This means that for schools to have zero tolerance to drugs, the students should be searched even in their inner garments.

According to law, the school was not justified in strip searching the student but in my opinion it is right to do so in order to discourage the students from having drugs in school. The federal magistrate had dismissed a suit by Redding and her mother because he felt that the search did not violate her rights. The Supreme Court judgment said that the search was “an invasion of constitutional rights” and the principal was found to be personally liable (Ducat and Harold 800). This made Redding to secure a victory for school children in the whole nation. This can cause a negative impact to the schools as it gives students a leeway to take illicit drugs in school. They can safely hide drugs in their inner garments because they are assured that strip searching cannot be imposed. Therefore it becomes very hard for the school administrators to prevent illicit drug use and even enforce discipline in the schools.

Buy custom Student Fundamental Rights essay paper cheap

Buy essayHesitating

Related essays

  1. Quasi Contract
  2. Petit v. the City of Chicago
  3. Rosenberg Trial
  4. Liberty and Justice for All
order now
chat off
our advantages
300 Words per page
12 pt Times New Roman double-spaced
MBA and PhD Writers
Relevant and up-to-date sources
US Writers
100% Confidentiality Guarantee
24/7 Support
24/7 Live Chat
Direct Contact with Writer
Flexible Discount Program
ANY Difficulty Level!
current status
1 chat / phone operators online at the moment
951 writers active
19457 writers in the database
3 new writers passed exam this week
20200 pages written
6311650 words written
8.5 out of 10 current average quality score
97% satisfied customers
current status
Blog categories
Academic Assistance
Analysis Essay
College Essay
Student's Life
Writing an Essay
Writing Helper
current status
Latest posts
Four Surprising Meanings of the Word ‘Bachelor’
4 Ways to Train both Reading and Writing at the Same Time
How to Write a Classification Essay Well?
Basic Essay Types All Students Must Know
How to Take Control over Your Life
current status

  • Paypal



off your first

custom essay order.

Order now

from $12.99/PAGE