Free Custom «Leon Trotsky» Essay Paper

Free Custom «Leon Trotsky» Essay Paper

Leon Trotskybirthwas on 7 November 1989. His birthplace was Yanovka, Ukraine where he was a key figure in the creation of the Soviet Union. His recognizablenameamong many people was Lenin's right-hand man, and his name at birth was Lev Davidovich Bronstein. He was also aconspicuousfigure in early Soviet Union and hasrepeatedlybeen evaluated by a lot of people and historians.

There has been a lot ofcompromiseconcerning thecareeranalysisof Leon Trotsky, and some of the politicalcampaignused waged war on him in the 1930s by Stalin. Trotskywas laudedas Lenin’s right-man, Trotsky in the revolutionaftermaththat wasimmediate. Following Lenin’s death, Stalin got to portray himself as a traitor to a Naziagentof Germany also to the Revolution. Theorthodoxyamong communities in the rest of the world and Russia came to be due to thisseriesof events that were occurring at that time. On the other hand, Trotsky himself got toproducealucidaccountabout his own life thereby presenting himself as a victim in Stalin’s quest for power.

There was careful documentation of that account. It was sodeeplydetailed, and hadsuch awesomedocumentation, that it got the chance tobecomeone of themanysources that wasnecessary for historians from the West who were studying thatperiod.Thefactwhich never appeared to surprised many was when they decided totakeTrotsky’s role in a moresympatheticmanner. Historians had only been able topresenta more balanced view of Trotsky’scareerin the recent times than there was before, since there was a lot of research done at the time.

The peple whogetto admire Trotsky’s politicalachievementand his military ones are those whogettoviewhim in a moresympatheticmanner. They alsogetto admire hisexcellentintellectualcapabilityas well as his idealism. Also, theygetto admire his dedication to the cause of revolution. Trotsky’s has critics who alsogettoacknowledgethe successes that he had during the time of the Revolution also during the time of the Civil War. Trotsky was the one who got toorganizethe coup, getting toarrangethe armies by the Red Guards, so as tocapturebuildings that werekeyto the public, and the installations that were in Moscow and Petrograd. Since he wasthoroughlyprepared, the citiesfellwith relatively little bloodshed.

A historian, whose name was Isaac Deutcher, gets todoubtthat there could be anyleaderthat could do what Trotsky did, sinceeven Stalin recognized hiscrucialrole in those early days. Trotsky waslatergiven theroleandtaskof negotiating the Brest-Litovsk treaty which he got to do despite his own worries. In late that year he a given the task of rebuilding thearmyof the Russians and defeating the whites when they conquered during the civil war.

Trotsky got toshowanddemonstratehis abilities as aspeakerlateron during that time, also as a strategic planner who knows how to do his work and how toorganizeindividuals. It is soclearthat indeed without him, the Red army would unlikely have won the civil war. Stabilizing the Russian economy was where Trotsky got to turn his attention to later on, and thepolicyhe helpedcomeup with became to be known as NEP. He argued that the peasants wouldneeda heavier taxation sso as to raise enoughcapitalneeded tofinanceindustrialization.

Thisvieweventually prevailed, therefore, getting to see that Trotsky’srolewas particularly crucial in 1971-1921. Stalinist historian’s accounts of Trotsky’s life have not disputed this though a few accounts of his own lifehavedisputed. However, it is not all of Trotsky’scareerassessmentsare accomplished. Onecaseis about hisheavycriticismagainst his actions during the Civil War that seem to be ruthless. He was responsible for conscription re-introduction and that of the death penalty for cases of dissertation. He also got toorderthe Red Army tocrushthe Kronstadt sailors, which got toresultto the deaths of many men, who had once been supporters of the revolution and were intensely loyal.

His inabilities toformulaterealisticpolicies following Lenin’s death have also got to be criticized by a lot of people. He got to continue supporting the ‘permanent revolution’ in particular at a time when such policies had little hope of success. Trotsky’scharacteris also blamed for allegedly alienating supporters who were potentialitymightyin the power struggle with Stalin. They believe that hisloftymannerand arrogance and his naivety in hispoliticsmade himleadershipunsuitable. Therefore, it isexceedinglydifficult to obtain a balanced view of Leon Trotsky thoughhistoryhas been kind enough to him than it has to his political rival Stalin.

Trotsky’srolein history has divided historians in some way, but they condemn Stalin as a killer and adictator. Trotsky though gets towinin this conflict.

 

Our Customers' Testimonials

Current status

0

Preparing Orders

0

Active Writers

0

Support Agents

 
Order your 1st paper and get discount Use code first15
X
We are online - chat with us!