Free Custom «Leon Trotsky» Essay Paper

Free Custom «Leon Trotsky» Essay Paper

Leon Trotsky birth was on 7 November 1989. His birthplace was Yanovka, Ukraine where he was a key figure in the creation of the Soviet Union. His recognizable name among many people was Lenin's right-hand man, and his name at birth was Lev Davidovich Bronstein. He was also a conspicuous figure in early Soviet Union and has repeatedly been evaluated by a lot of people and historians.

There has been a lot of compromise concerning the career analysis of Leon Trotsky, and some of the political campaign used waged war on him in the 1930s by Stalin. Trotsky was lauded as Lenin’s right-man, Trotsky in the revolution aftermath that was immediate. Following Lenin’s death, Stalin got to portray himself as a traitor to a Nazi agent of Germany also to the Revolution. The orthodoxy among communities in the rest of the world and Russia came to be due to this series of events that were occurring at that time. On the other hand, Trotsky himself got to produce a lucid account about his own life thereby presenting himself as a victim in Stalin’s quest for power.

There was careful documentation of that account.  It was so deeply detailed, and had such awesome documentation, that it got the chance to become one of the many sources that was necessary for historians from the West who were studying that period. The fact which never appeared to surprised many was when they decided to take Trotsky’s role in a more sympathetic manner. Historians had only been able to present a more balanced view of Trotsky’s career in the recent times than there was before, since there was a lot of research done at the time.

The people who et to admire Trotsky’s political achievement and his military ones are those who get to view him in a more sympathetic manner. They also get to admire his excellent intellectual capability as well as his idealism. Also, they get to admire his dedication to the cause of revolution. Trotsky’s has critics who also get to acknowledge the successes that he had during the time of the Revolution also during the time of the Civil War. Trotsky was the one who got to organize the coup, getting to arrange the armies by the Red Guards, so as to capture buildings that were key to the public, and the installations that were in Moscow and Petrograd. Since he was thoroughly prepared, the cities fell with relatively little bloodshed.

A historian, whose name was Isaac Deutcher, gets to doubt that there could be any leader that could do what Trotsky did, since even Stalin recognized his crucial role in those early days. Trotsky was later given the role and task of negotiating the Brest-Litovsk treaty which he got to do despite his own worries. In late that year he a given the task of rebuilding the army of the Russians and defeating the whites when they conquered during the civil war.

Trotsky got to show and demonstrate his abilities as a speaker later on during that time, also as a strategic planner who knows how to do his work and how to organize individuals. It is so clear that indeed without him, the Red army would unlikely have won the civil war. Stabilizing the Russian economy was where Trotsky got to turn his attention to later on, and the policy he helped come up with became to be known as NEP. He argued that the peasants would need a heavier taxation so as to raise enough capital needed to finance industrialization.

This view eventually prevailed, therefore, getting to see that Trotsky’s role was particularly crucial in 1971-1921. Stalinist historian’s accounts of Trotsky’s life have not disputed this though a few accounts of his own life have disputed. However, it is not all of Trotsky’s career assessments are accomplished. One case is about his heavy criticism against his actions during the Civil War that seem to be ruthless. He was responsible for conscription re-introduction and that of the death penalty for cases of dissertation. He also got to order the Red Army to crush the Kronstadt sailors, which got to result to the deaths of many men, who had once been supporters of the revolution and were intensely loyal.

His inabilities to formulate realistic policies following Lenin’s death have also got to be criticized by a lot of people. He got to continue supporting the ‘permanent revolution’ in particular at a time when such policies had little hope of success. Trotsky’s character is also blamed for allegedly alienating supporters who were potentiality mighty in the power struggle with Stalin. They believe that his lofty manner and arrogance and his naivety in his politics made him leadership unsuitable. Therefore, it is exceedingly difficult to obtain a balanced view of Leon Trotsky though history has been kind enough to him than it has to his political rival Stalin.

Trotsky’s role in history has divided historians in some way, but they condemn Stalin as a killer and a dictator. Trotsky though gets to win in this conflict.


Our Customers' Testimonials

Current status


Preparing Orders


Active Writers


Support Agents

Order your 1st paper and get discount Order now
We are online - chat with us!