Campuses are probably one of the most diversified communities in the world. It is in fact being considered to be the second home of every student in the world regardless of where these students are located. With the increasing need for education, it is but proper to ask whether or not the universities and campuses are prepared enough to face the complexities and consequences of having diversified groups within its territory. Diversity does not only mean to connote that people are from different races although it is more inclined to tackle racial differences. However, it must be noted that diversity is not only races but more so religion, political affiliations and educational background. Each and every person differs from one another and diversity is something that cannot be avoided. The growing number of enrolees for each school year posits a great danger into how the campus will deal with diversity. Will tolerance be enough to maintain a peaceful learning environment? Or will it simply pave the way for people to not care as to what is happening with their fellow students? It is in this regard that there is a need to understand tolerance and diversity on a deeper and more accurate manner so as to prevent wrong moves and put those in the minority in a very detrimental situation (Lustig, 97). It cannot be denied that it is the role of the campus educators and facilitators to ensure that each and diversified groups and ethnicities in the campus or university are being afforded equal rights and opportunities for growth and learning. Hence, it is in this regard, that this paper will discuss the extent of tolerance created and implied in order to protect diversity in campuses. Do moral education and tolerance meet the needs of the students and the faculty in as far as diversity is concerned?
It is a known fact that education is a platform for diversity. As a matter of fact, in the United States of America, it is reported that one third of the students enrolled in public schools are speaking a first language that is not English. Hence, the minority is increasing. This is particularly true in campus and universities where there foreign exchange students are being accepted. The interaction between different races will then increase. However, the question being posited is whether or not the socialization will yield a positive result or will it pave the way for an increased discrimination. In this regard, most campuses are employing a tolerance for diversity in order to ensure equal rights especially for students from different races. By tolerance, it means that the students are being asked not to cross the lines between racial differences. It means that the students must learn to respect each other regardless of whether or not they are Americans, Asians, Germans or Canadians. The students are being taught not to violate other people simply because they are different or because they belong to a minority. It is a known fact that racial discrimination is one of the major problems and challenges that are being faced by campus facilitators. Everyday there is a growing number of complaints and drop outs in campuses as consequences of bullying and racial discrimination. Hence, it can be seen that imposing tolerance in diversity is the solution just like what the Brookdale has. But then again, there is a downside of this tolerance movement. It will definitely help those in the minorities to act without fear of being bullied but socialization will definitely be affected. With the imposition of tolerance in diversity, the campuses are creating a certain degree of suspended ignorance among the students.
Instead of fostering socialization and commitment to interact with other people from different races, tolerance will simply teach the students that life is not about interdependency but rather on a solo exploration of life. There will be a lack of interest into embracing pluralism in universities and campuses. Hence, there will definitely be no effort to embrace diversity at all. It will just be a mere tolerated event or phenomenon that no one will be interested to embrace in the quest to improve how students should treat each other and other racial class. Tolerance, then, can be said to be a shallow solution of trying to cover up the real problem of students not being ready to face a diversified world of education. This situation will make it hard for the racial minority. Campuses should start to create and impose a moral education that will help and guide students to embrace that reality that people are different from each other but it does not mean that one race is less than the other. All races are equal. It does not matter whether or not the student has a white, black or brown skin. It is about learning to socialize with them without having to harm their well-being. Campuses should be a platform where students interact with each other and make friends with each other. It should not be an avenue where those who feel they are superior against the minority are tolerated (Janis, 112).
With all the foregoing, it cannot be denied that diversity is one of the realities of campuses and universities. Students from all over the world will somehow see each other in a certain campus. However, tolerance in diversity will make life easier for the students. But it can be improved by incorporating strategies and techniques that will enable the students to accept and embrace diversity in campuses.