The take on sex education has been a divisive in the society and in the international perspective. There are two types of sex education in the United States which include: comprehensive and abstinence-only. Both comprehensive and abstinence-only are educational units that act as defense weapon or toll against teen parenting, HIV/AIDS, unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. As it is difficult to keep teens from having sex, the issue therefore contributes to teen sex issues which are very complex. The education further addresses the inevitability that some adolescent have or are likely to engage in sexual practices. This has led to various states to introduce school districts that currently facilitate the provision of condoms in schools and condom availability programs. Giving information and introducing contraception in most educational centers and offering lessons on how to have “safer” sex is an fundamental component of comprehensive sex education (Pennylegion, Michelle, and Hillard, Pamela, 337). This paper thus claims that it is important to have safer sex by using condom which should be provided to teens.
Basic pros and Cons
Basically, online debates outlines the argument for and against condom availability in schools Some positive aspects of providing condoms included that providing condoms could reduce incidence of unwanted, teenage pregnancy and the spread of STDs. Consequently, comprehensive sex education program which in the real sense includes the provision of condom agrees with the unavoidability of pubescent sex and therefore persuades students to make intelligent and safe decisions if they wish to have sex (Fanburg, Jonathan Thomas, 182).
According to me, it is worth for the government to invest in the supply condoms for schools in that it is very costly when tackling the problem that is witnessed by irresponsible sexual acts. Condom availability would also make condom use to increase and on the other hand decrease the concession necessary to get a partner to accept using condom. Lastly, another positive aspect of condoms in schools is that they are the most effective way to preventing early pregnancy, STDs, and HIV/AIDS.
Providing condoms in schools is a much debated characteristic of some comprehensive programs. In contrast, abstinence-only programs discuss self-denial from sex until an individal married, as this is the only guarantee of fortification from the growing epidemics such as teenage pregnancy and HIV/AIDS. Advocates of either program have strong opinions on having condoms available to students in school. I feel abstinence should be encouraged but in addition, the impossibility of force should be recognized and safe sex practices should be made more widely available. When you read both sides of the debate on whether or not public schools and institutions should supply condoms to students. In addition, schools should be required to provide condoms to their students for a number of reasons.
Arguments against Condom availability of condoms in high schools
The squabble in opposition to circulation of condoms entails the hypothesis that leads to earlier commencement of sexual act which is a prospective offence to religious groups. Christians believe that it is wrong to support a program that is ethically abhorrent. Just as a pro side of condom accessibility is that condom use is likely to become the model, on the other hand con side of the argument is that sexual activity is likely to become the norm. Adolescent sexual activity will be expected, and peer demands to slot in sexual behavior is likely to augment. As a final point, it is also considers the relative ineffectiveness of condoms, especially when used improperly, as is commonly done by those inexperienced, or young. In many instances, argument against condom availability in schools is either ethical or sacred in nature.
Singer, (78) argued that feelings are not only articulated in American society only. In countries where the HIV/AIDS epidemic is spreading at a high rate, scores of officials are taking a stand against condom accessibility in schools or learning institutions in general. For example, In Uganda, education official are in conformity that abstinence should be the only message to the teens but not condoms. One Ugandan official, Aggrey Kibenge, rose against the accessibility of condoms, saying “Kids below 18 years old of age are not trusted to take autonomous decisions so they should not be provided with condoms.”
However, several people are strongly opposing the availability of condoms in schools; many others recommend that condoms should be provided to the teens in high school. In Zambia, President Mwanawasa, disquallified the allotment of condoms in schools, in him opposing he stated that the act is likely to encourage wickedness, dissipation and actually lead to an increase in HIV/AIDS spread among teenagers.
In order to examine the possible benefits and risks of condom availability in schools, it is of prime importance to think about the empirical evidence. As varied research found that accessibility of condoms in high school was harmless and really helpful in the deterrence of pregnancy, STDs, and HIV/AIDS while others found no results or effects. Some studies examined the attitudes of students and parents regarding condom availability programs. For example, in New York public high schools, 69% of parents believed students should be able to obtain condoms in schools, but almost half felt they should have the right to keep their children from doing so. These parents therefore believe that provision of condoms to schools is of vital importance to the teens that are sexually active.
Furthermore, another study established and confirmed that if a condom distribution program is put into place; there was no change recorded in the percentage of both the genders who had betrothed in sexual interaction or intercourse. Finally, these students’ attitudes towards sexual behavior stayed the same or became less favorable due to the fact that most children usually indulge in sexual relationships at an early stage and mostly during high school edification times (Rosenbaum, Ronnie, 186).
It is therefore evident that the benefits and risks of making condoms available in schools is promising in some respects, questionable to other individuals but the fact remains that it is open to doubt in the end. Looking at the current situation whereby epidemics such as early teen pregnancy, increase of STDs and HIV/AIDS. Introduction of such a program in schools is the best possible intervention. As widespread belief by religious groups, motivated by the search and spread of religious ideals inhibits the enactment of this program in many school districts, more conclusive evidence and support is likely to be more important than their personal moral objections. This is an important aspect in the society at large as the responsiveness is likely to help the young talented individuals who are the future leaders our nation and without them prosperity is derailed.